Publication

The best articles will be published in the journal BIO Web of Conferences:

 

The peer-reviewed articles of the conference will be published in the journal «Horse Breeding and Equestrian Sports».

The scientific journal “Horse Breeding and Equestrian Sports” is registered with the Federal Service for Supervision in the Sphere of Communications, Information Technologies and Mass Communications under No. pi No. fs77 — 81170 dated 06/02/2021
Founder: FGBNU “VNII Equine Breeding”
Publisher: FGBNU “VNII” horse breeding»

The journal «Horse Breeding and Equestrian Sports» is included by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in the list of peer-reviewed scientific publications in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the scientific degree of Candidate of Sciences and for the scientific degree of Doctor of Science, in scientific specialties, should be published:

• 4.2.4. Private animal science, feeding, technologies for preparing feed and producing livestock products (agricultural sciences);

• 4.2.5. Animal breeding, selection, genetics and biotechnology (agricultural and biological sciences);

• 1.5.5. Human and Animal Physiology (Agricultural Sciences)

• 1.5.20. Biological Resources (Agricultural Sciences);

 

———————————

As you prepare for your presentation at the conference, please keep the following points in mind:

— presentations should last no longer than 10 minutes.
— members include many experts, please allow a full 15 minutes for audience questions and commentary.
— we must receive presentation files no later than 14 days prior to the conference.

REVIEW PROCESS

Only papers of original research type performing results of original studies are accepted. The recommended size of a paper is 8-12 pages.
All papers pass scientific and technical review.
Within the framework of technical review, all papers are thoroughly checked for the following attributes:
— for compliance with the subject of the conference,
— for plagiarism,
— for acceptable English language,
— research quality, the significance of the topic, clarity of the objectives and conclusions and the agreement between them.
If the manuscript does not meet these initial criteria, the author will be contacted to revise the manuscript according to the requested standards. Manuscripts that are rejected at this point typically have significant flaws, lack originality, exhibit poor language usage, or do not align with the conference’s scope.
Authors whose papers are rejected during this initial evaluation will receive direct notification.
After successfully passing the first review stage, the manuscript is assigned to two reviewers who are specialists in the relevant field of the submission.
Reviewers are given an assessment form prompting them to evaluate the manuscript based on its novelty, originality, contribution to the field, ethical considerations, quality of data, scientific relevance and long-term value, practical implication, article structure, literature review, methodology appropriateness, clarity of results and discussion, documentation, and references provided.
In cases where the two reviewers differ in their assessment of the paper, a second round of peer review may be initiated, or extra reviewer(s) may be assigned.
Upon receiving the manuscript with notes for minor or major revisions, it will be forwarded to the author along with a manuscript evaluation form.
Authors are granted one week to address corrections for manuscripts accepted with minor revisions.
For manuscripts accepted with major revisions, authors will have a two-week period for the revision process.
Following acceptance by the editorial team, the manuscript will go through a series of processes including copyediting, layout editing, and proofreading to check its linguistic quality, relevance and clarity of figures/tables.
Once the editing stage is completed, authors will be asked to carefully review the final version in PDF format.
Live participation in the conference is an indispensable condition for the publication of the paper.

Publishing Ethics

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society of society-owned or sponsored journals. (cited by the ELSEVIER)

Download  Ethical-guidelines-for-journal-publication-Elsevier

Duties of Authors

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial ‘opinion’ works should be clearly identified as such.

Data Access

Authors may be asked to provide the research data supporting their paper for editorial review and/or to comply with the open data requirements of the journal. Authors should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable number of years after publication. Authors may refer to their journal’s Guide for Authors for further details.

Originality and Acknowledgement of Sources.

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted and permission has been obtained where necessary.
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have influenced the reported work and that give the work appropriate context within the larger scholarly record. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source.
Plagiarism takes many forms, from ‘passing off’ another’s paper as the author’s own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another’s paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical behaviour and is unacceptable.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication.

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal of primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical behaviour and is unacceptable.
An author should not submit for consideration in another journal a paper that has been published previously, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis or as an electronic preprint. Publication of some kinds of articles (e.g. clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.

Confidentiality.

Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the Paper.

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made substantial contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the paper (e.g. language editing or medical writing), they should be recognised in the acknowledgements section.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Authors are expected to consider carefully the list and order of authors before submitting their manuscript and provide the definitive list of authors at the time of the original submission. Only in exceptional circumstances will the Editor consider (at their discretion) the addition, deletion or rearrangement of authors after the manuscript has been submitted and the author must clearly flag any such request to the Editor. All authors must agree with any such addition, removal or rearrangement.
Authors take collective responsibility for the work. Each individual author is accountable for ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

(cited by the ELSEVIER)

HOW TO PREPARE DOC FILES FOR UPLOAD

The manuscript must be in DOC (or DOCX) file. Make sure that your paper in MS Word is in strict accordance to the author’s template (download)
Be careful, no corrections will be made by the publisher after publication!
You need to carefully check your text, including authors’ names, initials, authors’ affiliations, references, which are the most current mistakes.
If you make mistake there, your names will not be properly indexed. Please ensure that affiliations are as full and complete as possible and include the country.
We publish papers written in good English only. Make sure that all text elements, formulas, tables, signs and inscriptions in figures are in English. The Greek alphabet is valid only in formulas.
Make sure that your list of references is presented correctly!
Online references will be linked to their original source via CrossRef only if they are correctly presented. If there are errors, the references will not be correctly indexed.
To do so, extra care should be taken when preparing reference lists. References should be cited in the text by placing sequential numbers in brackets (for example, [1], [2, 5, 7], [8-10]). They should be numbered in the order in which they are cited.
The quality of the digital images should have an original high-resolution, at least 300 dpi for figures that will be printed, and at least 150 dpi for an online only publication.

How-to-write-title-and-abstract

/cited by the EDP Science/